DSE Chinese|Argumentative Writing: Claim, Evidence and Reasoning — Tutor Prep Guide|Defensible stance, three ascending layers, five techniques
- 2026-11-02
Students can write I think, but all three paragraphs say the same thing. This lesson makes each paragraph take one step further, with evidence attached.
01 Prerequisites (3-minute check)
If any of these fails, fix it before the lesson starts.
| Skill | Quick check | Pass mark |
|---|---|---|
| Paragraph function | What should the first sentence of a body paragraph do? | State that paragraph point. |
| Evidence types | What separates factual from theoretical evidence? | Cases and figures versus principles and quotations. |
| Word budget | Of 650 words, how much does each body paragraph take? | About 170 words each. |
02 Lesson flow (60 minutes)
| Time | Stage | Tutor does | Student does |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-5 min | Opening question | Write two stances on the board and ask which one can be opposed | Vote and explain |
| 5-15 min | Prerequisite check | Three quick checks on topic sentences | Written answers |
| 15-35 min | Three-act script | Deliver the stance sentence, the ascending layers and the five techniques; ask for a restatement after each act | Restate each act |
| 35-45 min | Modelled questions | Model a stance rewrite and one complete layer, labelling the technique | Copy and label |
| 45-55 min | Independent practice | Circulate and only ask what the evidence is | Work three items and self-check |
| 55-60 min | Exit check | Collect answers and count errors | Written answers |
03 Teaching script (read it out)
Scene 1: Act one: a stance must be opposable
What makes a stance acceptable, and how do you test it?
Scene 2: Act two: three layers must climb
What relation moves one layer to the next? Give an example from your own prompt.
Scene 3: Act three: each technique does one job
Which writing problem does each of the five techniques solve?
04 Question types and worked steps
| Type | Example | Steps | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stance rewrite | Turn charging for waste is important into a stance someone could oppose. | 1) Name the group; 2) add the condition; 3) state the direction of judgement. | Example: In old districts without recycling facilities, a waste charge mainly raises costs for low-income families while cutting little waste. |
| One complete layer | In 170 words write point, evidence, explanation. | 1) Open with the point; 2) place one concrete case or figure; 3) close by explaining how it supports the point. | Example: Enforcement costs more than the waste it saves; then one estate case; then one line tying it back. |
| Contrast technique | Contrast the same policy in two districts. | 1) Give the result in the first; 2) give the result in the second; 3) name the difference in one line. | Example: One district with collection points saw participation rise; another without them saw violations concentrate. |
| Rebuttal | State the strongest opposing line, then answer it. | 1) Restate the opponent accurately; 2) show the premise fails or the scope is limited; 3) return to your stance. | Example: Some say a charge builds habits, but that assumes residents have an alternative. |
05 Independent practice (3 questions)
| Question | Answer | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Rewrite tutoring benefits students into an opposable stance. | Example: For students who already study independently, tutoring yields less than the sleep they lose. | Check for a named group and a condition; a bare judgement is not enough. |
| Give three ascending layers for schools should ban phones for junior students. | Example: classroom attention, then campus order and peer relations, then long-term self-management. | Check the layers can be separated; overlapping layers need rewriting. |
| Write 80 words using contrast between two classes and their phone use. | Example: One class collects phones and questions rise; the other keeps them and heads drop midway. | Check both results appear under the same conditions. |
06 Common mistakes and what to say
| Mistake | Student writes | Say this |
|---|---|---|
| Stance written as a slogan | We should cherish time and study hard. | Nobody opposes that, so there is nothing to argue. Add a group and a condition. |
| Three paragraphs, one idea | First, tutoring wastes money. Second, it is useless. Third, it is not worth it. | Those three swap places, so you wrote one layer three times. Use individual, family, long term. |
| Evidence contradicting the point | Tutoring does not work, because my classmate got a top grade last year. | That is a success case against your own claim. Find evidence that supports the point. |
| Conclusion copying the opening | In conclusion, I think tutoring wastes money, so we should not tutor. | Concede one thing, then close: even with short-term gains, students still need to learn on their own. |
07 Homework (paper, section and question numbers)
- Secondary Chinese chapter index: finish the three practice items here, then practise summarising with the reading theme chapter — Practice 1-3 on this page
08 Exit check (last 5 minutes)
| Question | Answer | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Which two things must an acceptable stance contain? | A named group and an opposable judgement | Missing both means reteach act one |
| How many words do the three layers take, and how do you test ascent? | 510 words; the topic sentences must change meaning when swapped | Cannot answer means reteach act two |
| Name the five reasoning techniques. | Example, quotation, contrast, analogy, cause and effect | Fewer than four means redo act three |
09 Tutor FAQ
Which year is this for?
Mainly S5; also S4 second term and S6 catch-up, where structure matters more than style.
Must there be three layers?
Three is safest at 650 words; stronger students may write two deeper layers if the evidence is full.
Is there supporting practice?
The homework row links to the secondary Chinese chapter index, alongside the reading theme chapter.
Find a tutor — freeTutor Registration →
A TutorZone lesson-prep guide. Written by the TutorZone team; questions and lesson flow are original and are not taken from any school or publisher material.


