S5 Geography | Coastal Landforms Paper 3 (Challenge)
- 2026-11-04
S5 Geography | Coastal Landforms Paper 3 (Challenge)
Paper 3 is all multi-step work: energy must be compared with period included, attenuation multiplies rather than adds, and a budget has to be taken from surplus to deficit to see the change.
Attempt first, mark afterwards Allow about thirty minutes; write the formula before substituting, keep the fraction remaining separate from the percentage lost, and check units and direction at the end.
01 Paper details (check answers afterwards)
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Questions | 10 items |
| Suggested time | About 30 minutes |
| Difficulty mix | Foundation 1 · Intermediate 2 · Challenge 6 · Error redo 1 |
| Chapter | Chapter: S5 Geography | Coastal Landforms |
| Level | S5 (Secondary 5) Geography |
02 Questions (10 items)
- FoundationTwo wave sets: the first has height 2 m and period 8.0 s, the second height 1 m and period 6.0 s. If energy varies with the square of height and with period, how many times more energy does the first carry?
- IntermediateA cliff retreats 0.5 m a year normally, and one major storm every 10 years removes another 6 m at once. What is the total retreat over 50 years?
- IntermediateLongshore drift moves 9,000 cubic metres a year eastwards and 3,500 westwards. What is the net drift?
- ChallengeA beach holds 60,000 cubic metres (1200 m by 25 m by 2 m) and loses a net 3,000 a year. With no nourishment, when is only thirty per cent left?
- ChallengeMangroves cut wave energy by thirty per cent for every 50 m of width. After 150 m, what fraction of the energy remains and what percentage has been lost?
- ChallengeA sea wall must resist a high tide of 2.1 m, a storm surge of 0.8 m and wave run-up of 1.2 m. What crest level is needed, and how much higher than the present wall of 3.4 m?
- ChallengeA cliff retreats 0.35 m a year over a planning horizon of 100 years, plus a margin of twenty per cent. How far from the edge should the setback line be?
- ChallengeAfter a dam, river sediment falls from 20,000 to 6,000 cubic metres a year, while 5,000 is lost offshore and 4,000 leaves by drift. What is the budget before and after, and how big is the change?
- ChallengeOption one: nourishment every 4 years at 300,000 dollars. Option two: a sea wall at 2,800,000 plus 25,000 a year. Over 40 years, what does each cost and which is cheaper?
- Error redoA student writes that beach nourishment replaces the lost sand and therefore solves coastal erosion for good. What is wrong?
03 Answers and one-line notes
| # | Answer | One-line note |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | About 5.33 times. | Four times 8.0 over one times 6.0 is 32 over 6, about 5.33; long-period swell from a distant fetch carries more energy, so height alone is not enough. |
| 2 | About 55 m. | Normal retreat is 0.5 times 50, or 25 m; the 50 years contain 5 storms adding 30 m, giving 55 m. A single average rate understates loss because collapse is episodic. |
| 3 | A net 5,500 cubic metres eastwards. | 9,000 less 3,500 is 5,500 towards the larger side; the net direction determines which way a spit hooks and which side of a groyne needs nourishment. |
| 4 | About 20 years. | The volume is 1200 times 25 times 2, or 60,000; seventy per cent of it is 42,000, and dividing by 3,000 gives 20 years, since only the removable part counts. |
| 5 | About 34.3 per cent remains, so 65.7 per cent is lost. | Each 50 m leaves 0.7, so three sections leave 0.7 cubed, or 0.34; the loss is 65.7 per cent, since attenuation multiplies rather than adds. |
| 6 | It needs 4.1 m, so 0.7 m more than now. | Summing 2.1, 0.8 and 1.2 gives 4.1 m, which is 0.7 m above the wall; all three components count, or waves overtop in a storm. |
| 7 | About 42 m. | 0.35 times 100 is 35 m, and times 1.2 gives 42 m; the margin absorbs rate error and sudden collapse, not appearance. |
| 8 | A surplus of 11,000 becomes a deficit of 3,000, a change of 14,000 cubic metres. | Before: 20,000 less 5,000 less 4,000 is 11,000; after: 6,000 less the same two is -3,000, a yearly loss of 3,000; the change is 14,000. Dams trapping sand are a common cause of beach narrowing. |
| 9 | Nourishment 3,000,000, the wall 3,800,000, so nourishment is cheaper by 800,000. | Nourishment runs 10 times at 300,000, giving 3,000,000; the wall is 2,800,000 plus 25,000 times 40, giving 3,800,000. The gap is 800,000, but what is protected and the risk of failure also matter. |
| 10 | The word for good is wrong: nourishment only tops up sand that keeps leaving, so it must be repeated every few years unless the sediment budget itself is fixed. | Nourishment treats a symptom, not the cause; unless upstream supply is restored and dredging stopped, the sand is lost again. A good answer notes the need for repeat cycles and the untouched sediment budget. |
04 What to do after marking
- After marking, redo only the wrong items and write down which step went wrong (formula, unit, or misread number).
- Repeat the same item two days later; move to the next paper only when both attempts are correct.
- Parents only need the answer and note columns; there is no need to explain every item.
Need a tutor for this chapter? Register hereTutor Registration →
Questions and answers are written originally by the TutorZone team and are not taken from any school, publisher or examination authority paper. Every value is checked by computer.


