/en-tutor-prep-s6-economics-gdp-national-income-practice-3/
/en-tutor-prep-s6-economics-gdp-national-income-practice-3/
英文版
3
General Inquiry: info@TutorZone.com.hk
Office Hours: Monday to Saturday - 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM
WhatsApp Monday to Sunday - 24 hours
Hotline: +852 6828 1809
Instant Support: +852 9061 3106

GDP and National Income Paper 3: Challenge

GDP and National Income Paper 3: Challenge

  • 2026-11-11

GDP and National Income Paper 3: Challenge

The limits of GDP as a welfare measure: environmental cost, unpaid work, the underground economy, distribution, and stock against flow, with practice on green output and per-head comparison.

Direct answers Answers and explanations for all ten questions

01 Paper details (check answers afterwards)

Item Detail
Questions 10
Suggested time 20
Difficulty mix Foundation 3 · Intermediate 3 · Challenge 3 · Error redo 1
Chapter Chapter: DSE Economics GDP and National Income
Level Paper 3 (challenge)

02 Questions (10 items)

  1. FoundationItem 1: GDP is 5 000 and environmental depletion is valued at 600. Find green GDP.
  2. FoundationItem 2: GDP rises while unpaid household care also increases. Can GDP capture that contribution, and why?
  3. FoundationItem 3: two countries share the same GDP but their populations differ twofold. Is comparing living standards by GDP alone sound?
  4. IntermediateItem 4: GDP is 5 000 and pollution damage from production is valued at 200. Find adjusted green GDP.
  5. IntermediateItem 5: country A has GDP of 40 000 with two million people; country B has the same GDP with five million. Find both per-head figures.
  6. IntermediateItem 6: a sector dealing largely in cash fails to report its sales. What happens to GDP?
  7. ChallengeItem 7: nominal GDP grows 12 per cent, prices rise 5 per cent and population grows 3 per cent. Find real growth per head.
  8. ChallengeItem 8: local GDP rises because heavy pollution is being cleaned up. Does that prove living quality improved?
  9. ChallengeItem 9: post-war reconstruction lifts construction and output, raising GDP. Does that show welfare improved?
  10. Error redoError 10: treating GDP as an absolute measure of welfare and assuming higher output always means a better life. How should this be answered?

03 Answers and one-line notes

# Answer One-line note
1 4400, since green GDP deducts resource depletion and environmental damage. What is deducted is the environmental cost, not government spending in general.
2 No. Unpaid housework and care are not market transactions and carry no market price, so they stay outside GDP. This is one of the main limits of GDP as a welfare measure.
3 No; compare GDP per head, and consider prices and income distribution as well. With equal totals and different populations, output per head can differ twofold.
4 4800, a reduction of 4 per cent. The monetary value of pollution has to be estimated, so different methods give different green figures.
5 A reaches 200.0 ten-thousand dollars and B 80.0, so A is two and a half times B. With equal totals, the per-head gap comes entirely from population.
6 GDP is understated because underground production is unrecorded. The size of the understatement is uncertain, so cross-country comparisons need care.
7 About 3.56 per cent: combine the three factors before subtracting one. Taking 12 minus 5 minus 3 gives 4 and overstates the true figure.
8 Not necessarily. The damage already occurred; clean-up spending counts as output, but welfare must net off the harm first. This is the classic problem of GDP counting repair costs as output.
9 Not directly. Rebuilding only restores pre-war stock; the net welfare change must count war losses. The distinction between stock and flow is the key to this kind of question.
10 GDP measures the value of market production only; it ignores leisure, unpaid work, environmental cost and distribution, so it is a rough guide at best. List at least three limits and name alternatives such as output per head, green output and the human development index.

04 What to do after marking

  • After marking, redo only the wrong items and write down which step went wrong (formula, unit, or misread number).
  • Repeat the same item two days later; move to the next paper only when both attempts are correct.
  • Parents only need the answer and note columns; there is no need to explain every item.

When challenging an output measure, work from what it counts and what it misses; the answer then writes itself.Tutor Registration →

Questions and answers are written originally by the TutorZone team and are not taken from any school, publisher or examination authority paper. Every value is checked by computer.

Join as a tutor or coach — academic, music, sports, arts, STEM. Free to register. See how it works →