DSE Economics | International Trade and Comparative Advantage Teaching Guide (for tutors) | Opportunity Cost, Terms of Trade and Tariff Trade-offs
- 2026-11-02
Students say free trade is good but start guessing when asked which country should produce what. This lesson uses one opportunity-cost table to link specialisation, terms of trade and tariffs.
01 Prerequisites (3-minute check)
If any of these fails, fix it before the lesson starts.
| Skill | Quick check | Pass mark |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunity cost | How is the next best option costed | Invert the output ratio |
| Percentages | From 250 to 400 is what rise | Sixty percent |
| Demand and supply | What happens to quantity demanded when price rises | Move left along the demand curve |
02 Lesson flow (60 minutes)
| Time | Stage | Tutor does | Student does |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-10 min | Diagnose and cost | Two countries, 100 hours each; write the production table | Derive 2 and 0.33 |
| 10-24 min | Find advantage | Compare opportunity costs, not absolute output | A makes cloth, B makes wine |
| 24-36 min | Gains from trade | Use all 100 hours, then add world output | Cloth +60%, wine +20% |
| 36-46 min | Terms of trade | Pick a rate between 0.33 and 2 | Set one wine for one cloth |
| 46-56 min | Tariff and quota | Compare price, volume and surplus | Price becomes 500 |
| 56-60 min | Exit check | Three items marked live | All three right |
03 Teaching script (read it out)
Scene 1: Comparative advantage is about cost, not size
One wine costs A 2.0 cloth but B only 0.33 cloth, so B should make wine.
Reversed, one cloth costs A 0.5 wine but B 3.0 wine, so A should make cloth.
The rule: absolute output can favour one country on both goods, but comparative advantage always splits one good each.
Ask students: if A is faster at both goods, should A make both (no, compare opportunity cost).
Scene 2: Specialisation is an addition, not a miracle
With full specialisation A makes 400 cloth and B makes 300 wine, so the world holds 400 cloth and 300 wine: cloth up 150 (+60%) and wine up 50 (+20%).
The gain comes from the same hours of work, reallocated, so it is efficiency rather than extra effort.
Ask students: does world output rise because workers work harder or because tasks are matched better (matching).
Scene 3: Terms of trade sit between the two costs; a tariff moves the price again
Both gain, but unequally, so answers must discuss the distribution of gains.
A 25% tariff lifts the import price from 400 to 500.0: the price rises, imports fall, producer surplus rises, consumer surplus falls and the government collects the duty; a quota caps volume and produces a similar price effect but the gain goes to whoever holds the licences.
Ask students: what is the key difference between a tariff and a quota (who receives the gain).
04 Question types and worked steps
| Type | Example | Steps | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calculation | Opportunity cost | Invert the output ratio | 2.0 cloth per wine |
| Calculation | World gain after specialisation | Add totals before and after | Cloth +60% |
| Explanation | Why a small country still trades | Comparative, not absolute, advantage | Give one low-cost example |
| Essay | Tariff against quota | Price, volume, surplus, recipient | Four rows compared |
The terms of trade must lie between the two opportunity costs, otherwise one side refuses.
The specialisation gain comes from reallocating the same hours, not from new technology.
A 25% tariff raises price by 25%, but import volume need not fall by the same percentage: elasticity decides.
05 Independent practice (3 questions)
| Question | Answer | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| A opportunity cost of one wine | 2.0 cloth | 4 divided by 2 |
| World cloth gain after specialisation | +60% | 150 over 250 |
| A cloth left after trading 150 | 250 units | 400 minus 150 |
06 Common mistakes and what to say
| Mistake | Student writes | Say this |
|---|---|---|
| Judging by absolute output | A is faster at both, so A should make both | Count what is given up: two cloth for A against a third for B. |
| One-sided terms of trade | Three cloth for one wine | That is beyond B cost, so the rate must sit between 0.33 and 2. |
| Calling the gain a productivity jump | Specialisation raised productivity | The hours are unchanged; tasks moved to the lower-cost country. |
| Mixing tariff and quota revenue | Both give the government money | Quota rents go to licence holders, not the government. |
07 Homework (paper, section and question numbers)
- Practice: comparative advantage and terms of trade — Write the cost table first
- Practice: tariffs, quotas and consumer surplus — Compare four items
- All lesson-prep guides — Compare the ten-section structure
08 Exit check (last 5 minutes)
| Question | Answer | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| A opportunity cost of one wine | 2.0 cloth | All three right: move to trade policy |
| World cloth gain | +60% | One wrong: redo the split |
| Import price after a 25% tariff | 500.0 | Two wrong: back to act three |
09 Tutor FAQ
Must students memorise country data?
No. Papers supply the output table; the skill is converting output into opportunity cost.
Does free trade benefit everyone?
The total rises but import-competing industries lose, so name both winners and losers.
Why use Hong Kong services as an example?
Finance and logistics are the local low-cost case, and the same cost logic applies.
Find a tutor — freeTutor Registration →
A TutorZone lesson-prep guide. Written by the TutorZone team; questions and lesson flow are original and are not taken from any school or publisher material.


