DSE Geography | Energy and Resource Management Lesson-Prep Guide (Tutor Edition) | Mix, Efficiency, Capacity Factor
- 2026-11-02
Students hear “renewable” and write “clean and green”, while the question wants capacity factors and unit costs. This lesson drags the topic back to tables and arithmetic.
01 Prerequisites (3-minute check)
If any of these fails, fix it before the lesson starts.
| Skill | Quick check | Pass mark |
|---|---|---|
| Energy types | What counts as primary energy | Fossil, nuclear, renewable |
| Percentages | How to convert an amount to a share | Item divided by total |
| Units | How MW differs from MWh | Power versus energy, an hour apart |
02 Lesson flow (60 minutes)
| Time | Stage | Tutor does | Student does |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-8 min | Energy mix | Add six sources and convert to shares | Both groups total 100 |
| 8-20 min | Efficiency gap | One kilowatt-hour from 40% and 60% plant | 33.3% fuel saved |
| 20-34 min | Capacity factor | 100 MW farm at 40% | 350400 MWh a year |
| 34-46 min | Students compute | Same farm at 25% | Recompute unaided |
| 46-54 min | Policy judgement | Two for and two against, each with a figure | One figure per reason |
| 54-60 min | Exit check | Three quick questions | All three right |
03 Teaching script (read it out)
Scene 1: The mix is a percentage table, not a slogan
The three fossil cells add to 75%; the two low-carbon cells to 25%.
Students usually add coal and oil only and forget gas, which is still a fossil fuel: the mix answer always starts with the two shares.
Ask students: why gas still counts as fossil (it burns and emits, only less).
Scene 2: The efficiency gap is where fuel is saved
Saving = (2.5 – 1.667) / 2.5 = 33.3%; this line earns more than the phrase “higher efficiency reduces emissions”.
Link it to carbon intensity: coal 0.9 kg per kWh, gas 0.4 kg per kWh, so changing fuel changes emissions.
Ask students: why the saving is not 20% (the denominator is the old plant).
Scene 3: The capacity factor sets real output
At a 40% capacity factor the equivalent full-load hours are 3504, giving 350400 MWh a year; at 4000 kWh per home that serves about 87600 homes.
“Wind is unreliable” becomes an answer only when written as “capacity factor 40%, so 60% of the time output is below nameplate”.
Ask students: why solar capacity factors in Hong Kong sit below wind (sun hours and cloud).
04 Question types and worked steps
| Type | Example | Steps | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calculation | Energy shares | Each item divided by the total | 75% fossil |
| Calculation | Annual output | Nameplate x 8,760 x capacity factor | 350400 MWh |
| Calculation | Fuel saving | (old use – new use) / old use | 33.3% |
| Essay | Energy policy | Reliability, cost, carbon, siting: one line each | One figure per line |
A capacity factor lies between 0 and 1; anything above 876,000 MWh is a multiplication error.
Keep the denominator consistent: the old plant, not the new one.
Carbon intensity is kilograms per kWh, not per year, unless multiplied by annual use.
05 Independent practice (3 questions)
| Question | Answer | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Fossil share (coal 30, gas 25, oil 20) | 75% | 30 + 25 + 20 |
| Output of 100 MW at 40% capacity factor | 350400 MWh | 100 x 8,760 x 0.40 |
| Fuel saved from 40% to 60% efficiency | 33.3% | (2.5 – 1.667) / 2.5 |
06 Common mistakes and what to say
| Mistake | Student writes | Say this |
|---|---|---|
| Counting coal and oil only | Fossil 50% | Gas burns and emits too; skipping it loses 25 points of share. |
| Treating MW as MWh | “Annual output 100 MWh” | MW is power; energy needs an hour attached. |
| Assuming 100% capacity factor | Writing 876,000 MWh | A farm is not at full load all year. |
| Inverting the efficiency sum | “Saving 20%” | The denominator is the old 2.5 units, not the new 1.667. |
07 Homework (paper, section and question numbers)
- Paper 1 data question: energy mix chart (Q3-Q5) — Shares first, then the change
- Paper 2 essay: expand renewables? (Q8) — Four lines, one figure each
- All lesson-prep guides — Compare the ten-section structure
08 Exit check (last 5 minutes)
| Question | Answer | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Fossil share | 75% | All three right: next chapter |
| Annual output at 40% | 350400 MWh | One wrong: redo the 8,760 idea |
| Fuel saved | 33.3% | Two wrong: return to act two |
09 Tutor FAQ
Why split fossil from low-carbon?
Mark schemes reward comparison at the mix level, not a list of numbers.
Can a capacity factor exceed 50%?
Yes for offshore wind and hydro, but solar in Hong Kong usually stays below 20%.
Is nuclear renewable?
No; it is low-carbon but fuel-limited, so keep it separate.
Find a tutor — freeTutor Registration →
A TutorZone lesson-prep guide. Written by the TutorZone team; questions and lesson flow are original and are not taken from any school or publisher material.


