DSE History — European Integration and EU Enlargement Teaching Guide (for tutors) | Treaty dates, enlargement arithmetic, evaluating integration
- 2026-11-02
Students treat 1993 as the starting point, so the 1951 coal and steel community and the 1957 Treaty of Rome disappear. This lesson strings fifty years together with one sequence of member numbers.
01 Prerequisites (3-minute check)
If any of these fails, fix it before the lesson starts.
| Skill | Quick check | Pass mark |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage growth | 6 states to 28 | Denominator 6, so 367 percent |
| Treaty terms | Signature against entry into force | Ratification comes between them |
| Cold War context | How integration relates to the Cold War | Western Europe united against the Soviet Union |
02 Lesson flow (45 minutes)
| Time | Stage | Tutor does | Student does |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 min | Diagnostic three | Ask the EU founding year, first membership, euro cash year | Answer orally, write it down |
| 6-16 min | Timeline | Order 1945 to 2020, mark five years | Do it once, circle errors |
| 16-26 min | Enlargement arithmetic | Run 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 25 | Compute each step |
| 26-34 min | Three motive layers | Peace, economics, Cold War, one treaty each | One sentence per layer |
| 34-42 min | Evaluation practice | Supranational against intergovernmental | Stance, two proofs, one concession |
| 42-45 min | Exit check | Three items marked live | All three right before leaving |
03 Teaching script (read it out)
Scene 1: Signature and entry into force are two dates
Maastricht was signed in 1992 and in force in 1993; writing that the EU was founded in 1992 loses the mark.
Rule: after a year always write the action, signed, in force or joined.
Ask students: when was Rome signed and when did it take effect.
Scene 2: Enlargement is a sequence, not a list
From 6 to 28 states the club added 22, up 367 percent, about 4.7 times; the 2004 round alone added ten, which is 67 percent on top of fifteen.
The common trap is jumping from fifteen to twenty-seven in 2004.
Ask students: how many members after 2004, and why not twenty-seven.
Scene 3: Supranational against intergovernmental
Evidence on both sides: deepening through the single market and the euro, which was used for accounting from 1985 and in cash from 2002; backlash through referendums and Brexit in 2020.
Budget shares show the shift: farm support fell from about 70 percent to 33 percent, a fall of 37 points.
Answer format: one stance, two proofs, one concession.
Ask students: give one supranational and one intergovernmental example.
04 Question types and worked steps
| Type | Example | Steps | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chronology | Five key years | Year plus action | 1951 community, 1958 treaty in force |
| Calculation | Growth in membership | End minus start, divided by start | 367 percent |
| Explanation | Motive layers | Peace, economics, Cold War | One treaty per layer |
| Evaluation | Was integration a success | Stance, two proofs, one concession | Six to eight sentences |
Percentages use the earlier figure as denominator: 22 over 6 is 367 percent.
Population figures are approximate: the 2004 intake was about 75 million, some 17 percent of 448 million.
The euro was an accounting unit from 1985 but notes and coins arrived only in 2002.
05 Independent practice (3 questions)
| Question | Answer | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Growth from 6 to 28 states | 367 percent | 22 over 6 |
| 2004 intake against fifteen existing members | 67 percent | Ten over fifteen |
| Days from Rome signature to effect | 282 days | 25 March 1957 to 1 January 1958 |
06 Common mistakes and what to say
| Mistake | Student writes | Say this |
|---|---|---|
| Treating 1993 as the start | The EU was founded in 1993, before that there was nothing | 1993 was only a renaming; 1951 and 1957 came first. |
| Confusing signature with effect | Maastricht took effect in 1992 | Signed in 1992, in force in 1993. |
| Wrong enlargement totals | Ten joined in 2004 so there were twenty-seven | Fifteen plus ten is twenty-five; twenty-seven came in 2007. |
| Economics only | They integrated because it paid | Peace and Cold War security matter as much; write all three layers. |
07 Homework (paper, section and question numbers)
- Past paper: integration chronology and enlargement — Years first, then the action
- Practice: evaluate the success and limits of integration — Stance, two proofs, one concession
- All lesson-prep guides — Compare the ten-section structure
08 Exit check (last 5 minutes)
| Question | Answer | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Members after 2004 | Twenty-five | All three right: move on |
| Growth from 6 to 28 | 367 percent | One wrong: redo the sequence |
| Maastricht in force | 1993 | Two wrong: back to act one |
09 Tutor FAQ
Is the EU off-syllabus at S6
The syllabus asks for motives and limits of European integration, which this chapter covers.
How many years must be memorised
Five core years plus the enlargement sequence; the rest comes from source material.
Is there practice material
The homework links the in-site history practice pages with matching item numbers.
Find a tutor — freeTutor Registration →
A TutorZone lesson-prep guide. Written by the TutorZone team; questions and lesson flow are original and are not taken from any school or publisher material.


