AP Precalculus Drilling Guide: Calculator and No-Calculator Lines, Four FRQ Types, 12-Week Plan
- 2026-11-01
TUTORZONE EXAM DRILL GUIDE · AP PRECALCULUS (POLYNOMIAL, EXPONENTIAL, TRIG, POLAR)
Built on the exam structure in the official course and exam description: 2 hours 55 minutes in total; Section I is 42 multiple-choice items (Part A 29 items in 65 minutes without a calculator, Part B 13 items in 40 minutes with a graphing calculator, about 63% together); Section II is 4 free-response questions in 70 minutes (Part A 2 questions, 35 minutes, calculator allowed; Part B 2 questions, 35 minutes, no calculator, about 37% together). This page is the drilling method only – how to keep the calculator and no-calculator lines apart, the order for the four free-response types, a 12-week timetable, pacing, the usual mark losses and the error log. For questions with worked answers use the original mock linked below.
How is AP Precalculus assessed, and what does each part carry?
Section I Part A (multiple choice, no calculator): 29 questions: symbol manipulation and graphs (44%); Section I Part B (multiple choice, graphing calculator): 13 questions: some need a graphing calculator (radian mode) (19%); Section II Part A (free response, graphing calculator): 2 questions: function concepts, non-periodic modelling (19%); Section II Part B (free response, no calculator): 2 questions: periodic modelling, symbolic manipulation (19%)

Assessment at a glance (2027)
| Component | Content | Weighting | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section I Part A (multiple choice, no calculator) | 29 questions: symbol manipulation and graphs | 44% | 65 min |
| Section I Part B (multiple choice, graphing calculator) | 13 questions: some need a graphing calculator (radian mode) | 19% | 40 min |
| Section II Part A (free response, graphing calculator) | 2 questions: function concepts, non-periodic modelling | 19% | 35 min |
| Section II Part B (free response, no calculator) | 2 questions: periodic modelling, symbolic manipulation | 19% | 35 min |
AP Precalculus drilling technique: Unit 1 Polynomial and Rational Functions is 30-40% of the multiple choice, Unit 2 Exponential and Logarithmic 25-40%, Unit 3 Trigonometric and Polar 30-35%; Unit 4 is not assessed. Separate average from instantaneous rates of change, put log equations over a common base, and give every general solution for trigonometric equations. Each free-response question is 6 points – always explain what the model parameters mean.
What each paper is actually testing
| Paper | Drill focus | How marks are lost |
|---|---|---|
| Section I Part A (multiple choice, no calculator) | start with functions and rates of change | Section I Part A (29 items, 65 minutes, no calculator) answered by estimating the way a calculator would, with end behaviour and graph transformations recalled from memory, and the asymptotes and holes of rational functions misread |
| Section I Part B (multiple choice, graphing calculator) | set radian mode and the window first | Section I Part B (13 items, 40 minutes, graphing calculator) lost to a wrong window setting or an angle unit left in degrees, or to solving graphically what the item wanted algebraically, so the 3 minutes an item run out |
| Section II Part A (free response, graphing calculator) | explain what each model parameter means | Section II Part A (2 questions, 35 minutes, calculator) modelling answers that hand in an equation only – no meaning or unit for each parameter, and no statement of the assumptions behind the model |
| Section II Part B (free response, no calculator) | give the general solution of trig equations | Section II Part B (2 questions, 35 minutes, no calculator) symbolic work that skips lines, trigonometric identities and logarithm laws applied in the wrong direction, and a simplified form that never returns to the shape the question asked for |
What is each AP Precalculus paper really testing, and what should you drill?
Section I Part A (multiple choice, no calculator): start with functions and rates of change; Section I Part B (multiple choice, graphing calculator): set radian mode and the window first; Section II Part A (free response, graphing calculator): explain what each model parameter means; Section II Part B (free response, no calculator): give the general solution of trig equations
Drill order: by topic, then by year, then the mark scheme
| Step | What you do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1. By topic | Work through each topic, starting with the paper that allows least help (no calculator / closed book) | Exposes what is genuinely not understood |
| 2. By year | Whole papers to time, one or two a week | Trains pace, stamina and question selection |
| 3. Mark scheme | Go through the marking scheme question by question and log the scoring steps you missed | Most lost marks are written wrong, not thought wrong |
Should drilling go by topic first or by year?
By topic first, then whole papers by year, then the mark scheme. The first third of the time goes topic by topic (8-10 years of the same topic back to back), the middle switches to timed whole papers, and the last fortnight only redoes the recurring errors from your log.
A 12-week drilling timetable
| Week | Phase | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-3 | By topic: foundation | Topic by topic, starting with the easiest marks, building habits and recall |
| Weeks 4-6 | By topic: core | 8-10 years of the same topic back to back, errors classified by topic |
| Weeks 7-8 | By topic: advanced and electives | Elective and higher-order topics, now under time pressure |
| Weeks 9-10 | By year: timed papers | One full paper a week, timed, no reference materials |
| Week 11 | Mark scheme work | Question by question against the marking scheme; list the scoring steps you omitted |
| Week 12 | Plug holes and simulate | Only the recurring errors from your log, then one full exam simulation |
Subject-specific weighting for this timetable: Three passes over 12 weeks. Weeks 1-4 are by topic only: one pass each over polynomial and rational functions, exponential and logarithmic functions, and trigonometric and polar functions (10 multiple-choice items plus one free-response question inside 40 minutes), and every item is labelled calculator-allowed or no-calculator, with the two lines kept in separate books. Weeks 5-8 move to by year: one timed multiple-choice part (A or B), then one free-response question, self-marked point by point against the official scoring guidelines, checking that the modelling answer states what each parameter means. Weeks 9-12 are whole papers under time (2 hours 55 minutes run continuously), one a week, and from week 11 only the recurring errors in the log are redone plus whichever unit was skipped.
Use it properly: this is not a checklist to finish. Every week must keep time for redoing errors, or from week 9 you will be repeating the same batch.
Pacing
| Paper | Time | Suggested split |
|---|---|---|
| Section I Part A (multiple choice, no calculator) | 65 min | about 2 min 14 s per question |
| Section I Part B (multiple choice, graphing calculator) | 40 min | about 3 min per question |
| Section II Part A (free response, graphing calculator) | 35 min | about 17 min per question |
| Section II Part B (free response, no calculator) | 35 min | about 17 min per question |
How should the time be split inside each AP Precalculus paper?
Section I Part A (multiple choice, no calculator): about 2 min 14 s per question; Section I Part B (multiple choice, graphing calculator): about 3 min per question; Section II Part A (free response, graphing calculator): about 17 min per question; Section II Part B (free response, no calculator): about 17 min per question
The drilling mistakes that cost the most marks
| Mistake | What it looks like | What actually happens | Instead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average vs instantaneous rate | Substituting endpoints for instantaneous | They are different quantities | Average uses (f(b) – f(a)) / (b – a) |
| Only denominator asymptotes | Miss the horizontal one | Half the marks | Compare the degrees |
| One solution only | Stop at 2.498 | The general solution is missing | Write theta = pi – arcsin 0.6 + 2k pi |
The error log and the mark scheme
Three columns, never copied-out questions: calculator mode (angle unit, window, and whether the calculator was needed at all), parameters and units (what each constant in the model stands for, and whether its unit is written), direction of simplification (which trigonometric or logarithm law was used, and whether the answer came back to the shape the question asked for). Three entries in one column in a week means drill only that column next week; the parameters column is worth the most, because the free-response guidelines award the explanation and the assumptions as separate steps.
How many years should you drill?
The first AP Precalculus exam ran in May 2024, so only three sessions of questions have been released and by-year drilling alone is not enough: work through all the released free-response questions (four a year, twelve in total), and use the official samples plus original mocks for the rest of the task types. Multiple-choice items are not released, so Section I is paced on original mocks and textbook banks – about 2 minutes 14 seconds an item in Part A and about 3 minutes in Part B are the targets.
How many years of past papers is enough?
The first AP Precalculus exam ran in May 2024, so only three sessions of questions have been released and by-year drilling alone is not enough: work through all the released free-response questions (four a year, twelve in total), and use the official samples plus original mocks for the rest of the task types. Multiple-choice items are not released, so Section I is paced on original mocks and textbook banks – about 2 minutes 14 seconds an item in Part A and about 3 minutes in Part B are the targets.
Frequently asked questions
Is this page a mock paper or a drilling guide?
This is the AP Precalculus drilling guide: assessment structure, drill order, a 12-week timetable, pacing, common mark losses and the error-log method. For questions with answers, use the AP Precalculus mock papers linked under Related.
By topic or by year first?
By topic. Eight to ten years of the same topic back to back is what exposes repeating errors; going straight to whole papers just repeats the same batch under time pressure.
How should the error log be written?
Do not copy out questions. Per error record four things: question reference, which step failed (concept, wording, calculation), what the mark scheme requires, and the correct action next time.
Should the calculator and no-calculator parts be drilled separately?
Yes, and in two separate books. The same topic is solved differently on each side: without a calculator you drill factorising, logarithm laws and trigonometric identities, and with one you drill window settings, intersections and reading parameters off a graph. Drill them together and you will reach for the calculator in Part A, where it is not allowed, and burn minutes out of the 65.
The unit weightings are ranges – how should study time be split?
The official weightings are ranges: polynomial and rational functions 30-40%, exponential and logarithmic 25-40%, trigonometric and polar 30-35%, so do not split time evenly down the middle. Sit one mock first, count the marks lost per unit, and give the weakest unit the top of its range (40% in the example) while the others get the bottom – the total is still 12 weeks.
Official references
| Resource | What to use it for |
|---|---|
| College Board AP Precalculus exam page | Confirm the format, question counts and calculator policy |
| Official course and exam description (CED) | Check the Units 1-3 multiple-choice weightings |
| https://www.tutorzone.com.hk/en-ap-calculus-ab-mock-2027/ | AP Calculus AB drilling mock |
| https://www.tutorzone.com.hk/en-ap-calculus-past-paper-drill-guide/ | AP Calculus drilling guide |
Related: AP Precalculus original drilling mock with worked answers · practice area
Next step: find a tutor / register as a tutor
After drilling, the hard part is telling a conceptual error from a writing error. Tell us the year group, the school and your available times, and TutorZone will match you with a tutor who knows the HKEAA assessment requirements.
Demand for tutors in this subject is steady, and those who can explain the marking scheme and where marks are won are especially sought after. Register free; you pay only when a match succeeds.


