中文（繁體）
中文（简体）
English
IB Chinese A: Language and Literature Paper 1 Drill Guide: Guiding Questions and Text-Type Conventions
Name the text type before you argue effect
Paper 1 hands you two unseen non-literary texts with guiding questions: SL writes one in seventy-five minutes for twenty marks, HL writes two in two and a quarter hours for forty, both worth thirty-five per cent. Three criteria decide the mark: understanding and interpretation, analysis and evaluation, focus and organisation. Most answers stop at what the text says and score at the literal level. What earns marks is naming the text type, its conventions, how the writer uses or breaks them, and what that does to the reader.
How is IB Chinese A: Language and Literature Paper 1 assessed, and what does each part carry?
Paper 1: guided textual analysis: Two unseen non-literary texts from different text types, each with a g (SL 35% / HL 35%); Paper 2: comparative essay: One of four questions; compare and contrast two studied literary works (SL 35% / HL 25%); Individual oral (internal): 15 min, 40 marks: a literary work plus a body of non-literary texts re (SL 30% / HL 20%); HL essay (HL only): A 1,200-1,500 word essay (1,440-1,800 characters in Chinese) exploring (HL 20%)
Assessment at a glance (2027)
| Component | Content | Weighting | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 1: guided textual analysis | Two unseen non-literary texts from different text types, each with a guiding question; SL writes one analysis, HL writes one on each text | SL 35% / HL 35% | SL 1 h 15 min; HL 2 h 15 min |
| Paper 2: comparative essay | One of four questions; compare and contrast two studied literary works in content and form (25 marks: criteria A, B1, B2, C, D at 5 each); closed book, no quotations expected | SL 35% / HL 25% | 1 h 45 min |
| Individual oral (internal) | 15 min, 40 marks: a literary work plus a body of non-literary texts read through a shared global issue; ten minutes presenting plus five minutes of questions | SL 30% / HL 20% | 15 min |
| HL essay (HL only) | A 1,200-1,500 word essay (1,440-1,800 characters in Chinese) exploring one line of inquiry into a single literary work or a group of non-literary texts | HL 20% | coursework |
SL: one analysis in 1 h 15 min (5 min unpacking, 60 writing, 10 checking), 20 marks. HL: two analyses in 2 h 15 min, about 60 minutes each – take the text you are surer of first.
What each paper is actually testing
| Paper | Drill focus | How marks are lost |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1: guided textual analysis | tie every claim to the conventions of the text type and to a specific authorial choice (layout, image-text relation, register, rhetoric) and its effect | Content is retold without naming the text type or its conventions. |
| Paper 2: comparative essay | the comparison must be explicit (criterion B2); two separate mini-essays score badly | Quotations are dropped in with no effect stated. |
| Individual oral (internal) | show how the global issue is presented through specific textual detail, not generalities | Part of the guiding question goes unanswered. |
| HL essay (HL only) | keep the inquiry focused; an essay that introduces the text scores poorly | HL time is split too thinly and the second text is rushed. |
What is each IB Chinese A: Language and Literature Paper 1 paper really testing, and what should you drill?
Paper 1: guided textual analysis: tie every claim to the conventions of the text type and to a specific authorial choice (layout, image-text relation, register, rhetoric) and its effect; Paper 2: comparative essay: the comparison must be explicit (criterion B2); two separate mini-essays score badly; Individual oral (internal): show how the global issue is presented through specific textual detail, not generalities; HL essay (HL only): keep the inquiry focused; an essay that introduces the text scores poorly
Drill order: by topic, then by year, then the mark scheme
| Step | What you do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1. By topic | Work through each topic, starting with the paper that allows least help (no calculator / closed book) | Exposes what is genuinely not understood |
| 2. By year | Whole papers to time, one or two a week | Trains pace, stamina and question selection |
| 3. Mark scheme | Go through the marking scheme question by question and log the scoring steps you missed | Most lost marks are written wrong, not thought wrong |
Should drilling go by topic first or by year?
By topic first, then whole papers by year, then the mark scheme. The first third of the time goes topic by topic (8-10 years of the same topic back to back), the middle switches to timed whole papers, and the last fortnight only redoes the recurring errors from your log.
A 12-week drilling timetable
| Week | Phase | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-3 | By topic: foundation | Topic by topic, starting with the easiest marks, building habits and recall |
| Weeks 4-6 | By topic: core | 8-10 years of the same topic back to back, errors classified by topic |
| Weeks 7-8 | By topic: advanced and electives | Elective and higher-order topics, now under time pressure |
| Weeks 9-10 | By year: timed papers | One full paper a week, timed, no reference materials |
| Week 11 | Mark scheme work | Question by question against the marking scheme; list the scoring steps you omitted |
| Week 12 | Plug holes and simulate | Only the recurring errors from your log, then one full exam simulation |
Subject-specific weighting for this timetable: Weeks 1-3: drill the five-minute reading only. Before writing, put three lines on paper: the text type, its conventions, what the guiding question actually asks. Weeks 4-6: two texts a week at seventy-five minutes, every paragraph carrying one convention sentence and one effect sentence. Weeks 7-9: full HL doubles at two and a quarter hours, taking the stronger text first and ring-fencing an hour for the second. Weeks 10-12: unseen text types only, self-marking against the three criteria after each piece.
Use it properly: this is not a checklist to finish. Every week must keep time for redoing errors, or from week 9 you will be repeating the same batch.
Pacing
| Paper | Time | Suggested split |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1: guided textual analysis | SL 1 h 15 min; HL 2 h 15 min | SL: 5 min choosing and unpacking the question, 60 writing, 10 checking; HL: about 60 min per analysis, take the surer text first |
| Paper 2: comparative essay | 1 h 45 min | 15 min planning the comparative line, 75 writing, 15 checking |
| Individual oral (internal) | 15 min | work the literary work in detail first, then bridge to the non-literary body of work; prepare keywords, not a script |
| HL essay (HL only) | coursework | narrow the line of inquiry to one page first, then build three levels of analysis |
How should the time be split inside each IB Chinese A: Language and Literature Paper 1 paper?
Paper 1: guided textual analysis: SL: 5 min choosing and unpacking the question, 60 writing, 10 checking; HL: about 60 min per analysis, take the surer text first; Paper 2: comparative essay: 15 min planning the comparative line, 75 writing, 15 checking; Individual oral (internal): work the literary work in detail first, then bridge to the non-literary body of work; prepare keywords, not a script; HL essay (HL only): narrow the line of inquiry to one page first, then build three levels of analysis
The drilling mistakes that cost the most marks
| Mistake | What it looks like | What actually happens | Instead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content without form | Most of the response summarises what the leaflet or column says, with one closing line about technique | Almost all of criterion B is lost and criterion A stays literal | Every paragraph carries text-type convention, authorial choice and effect |
| Missing the non-literary features | Analysing a leaflet or advertisement with the vocabulary of poetry (imagery, metaphor, rhythm) | Layout, type size and image-text relations – the marks this paper is built on – go untouched | Establish the text type and its conventions first, then show how the writer uses or breaks them |
| Quotation with no work done | A line is quoted without saying how it works or what it does | The quotation decorates rather than analyses | Follow every quotation with what the choice makes the reader do |
| Setting your own question | Ignoring the guiding question and writing a personal response to the issue | Criterion C (focus) falls away; good writing still scores low | Copy the key words of the guiding question and answer them paragraph by paragraph |
The error log and the mark scheme
Three columns: the text type and question number; whether the loss was understanding, analysis or focus; the repair, naming the sentence to add next time. Three losses of the same kind means three texts of that type back to back the following week.
How many years should you drill?
The Language A course was first assessed in 2026, so the paper shape is new and only a few official samples exist. Work from the guide’s specimen questions and original mocks, and use older Language and Literature analysis questions for structure alone.
How many years of past papers is enough?
The Language A course was first assessed in 2026, so the paper shape is new and only a few official samples exist. Work from the guide’s specimen questions and original mocks, and use older Language and Literature analysis questions for structure alone.
Frequently asked questions
Is this page a mock paper or a drilling guide?
This is the IB Chinese A: Language and Literature Paper 1 drilling guide: assessment structure, drill order, a 12-week timetable, pacing, common mark losses and the error-log method. For questions with answers, use the IB Chinese A: Language and Literature Paper 1 mock papers linked under Related.
By topic or by year first?
By topic. Eight to ten years of the same topic back to back is what exposes repeating errors; going straight to whole papers just repeats the same batch under time pressure.
How should the error log be written?
Do not copy out questions. Per error record four things: question reference, which step failed (concept, wording, calculation), what the mark scheme requires, and the correct action next time.
Does writing both texts earn more?
No. At SL you choose one; writing both thins the time. Pick the text whose type you can name and whose conventions you can list, and spend the full seventy-five minutes there.
May I reframe the guiding question?
No. Criterion C rewards focus, and drifting costs marks. Copy the question’s key words at the top and answer them in order, saving your own extension for the closing paragraph.
Official references
| Resource | What to use it for |
|---|---|
| IB Studies in Language and Literature course page | Confirm the Paper 1 / Paper 2 structure and weightings |
| IB Chinese A: Language and Literature Paper 2 mock | The other paper of the same course: four comparative questions with 25-mark frames |
| IB Chinese A: Literature Paper 1 mock | The literature course in the same subject group, for cross-course comparison |
| practice area | Original mock papers and drilling guides across subjects |
Related: IB Chinese A: Language and Literature Paper 2 mock · IB Chinese A: Literature Paper 1 mock · IB Chinese B Paper 1 and Paper 2 reading mock · practice area
Next step: find a tutor / register as a tutor
After drilling, the hard part is telling a conceptual error from a writing error. Tell us the year group, the school and your available times, and TutorZone will match you with a tutor who knows the HKEAA assessment requirements.
Demand for tutors in this subject is steady, and those who can explain the marking scheme and where marks are won are especially sought after. Register free; you pay only when a match succeeds.