IGCSE Business 0450 Paper 2: Case Analysis and Evaluation
- 2026-11-03
Business: read the questions before the case
Paper 2 is one case study feeding four questions, and time is where candidates lose it: the early parts get over-written and the final evaluation is left with ten minutes. Marks come from using the case material, arguing both sides and reaching a conclusion – not from reciting definitions. Drill scanning the questions first, circling the figures you will need, then sizing each answer to its marks.
How is IGCSE Business Studies 0450 Paper 2 assessed, and what does each part carry?
Paper 2 (Case Study): 4 case-based questions, 80 marks (50%); Paper 1 (Short Answer / Data Response): Short answer and data response, 80 marks (50%)

Assessment at a glance (2027)
| Component | Content | Weighting | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 2 (Case Study) | 4 case-based questions, 80 marks | 50% | 1 h 30 min |
| Paper 1 (Short Answer / Data Response) | Short answer and data response, 80 marks | 50% | 1 h 30 min |
IGCSE Business Paper 2 drilling technique: read the questions before the case; show formulas (revenue = price x quantity, profit = revenue – costs); evaluation answers need both sides plus a conclusion.
What each paper is actually testing
| Paper | Drill focus | How marks are lost |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 2 (Case Study) | analysis + evaluation + conclusion | The case answer repeats a textbook definition without the firm name, figures or situation from the case, so it is correct but earns no application marks. |
| Paper 1 (Short Answer / Data Response) | define + calculate + explain | The evaluation gives one side only and concludes without the counter-argument, and the clock runs out so the final question gets two sentences. |
What is each IGCSE Business Studies 0450 Paper 2 paper really testing, and what should you drill?
Paper 2 (Case Study): analysis + evaluation + conclusion; Paper 1 (Short Answer / Data Response): define + calculate + explain
Drill order: by topic, then by year, then the mark scheme
| Step | What you do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1. By topic | Work through each topic, starting with the paper that allows least help (no calculator / closed book) | Exposes what is genuinely not understood |
| 2. By year | Whole papers to time, one or two a week | Trains pace, stamina and question selection |
| 3. Mark scheme | Go through the marking scheme question by question and log the scoring steps you missed | Most lost marks are written wrong, not thought wrong |
Should drilling go by topic first or by year?
By topic first, then whole papers by year, then the mark scheme. The first third of the time goes topic by topic (8-10 years of the same topic back to back), the middle switches to timed whole papers, and the last fortnight only redoes the recurring errors from your log.
A 12-week drilling timetable
| Week | Phase | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-3 | By topic: foundation | Topic by topic, starting with the easiest marks, building habits and recall |
| Weeks 4-6 | By topic: core | 8-10 years of the same topic back to back, errors classified by topic |
| Weeks 7-8 | By topic: advanced and electives | Elective and higher-order topics, now under time pressure |
| Weeks 9-10 | By year: timed papers | One full paper a week, timed, no reference materials |
| Week 11 | Mark scheme work | Question by question against the marking scheme; list the scoring steps you omitted |
| Week 12 | Plug holes and simulate | Only the recurring errors from your log, then one full exam simulation |
Subject-specific weighting for this timetable: Weeks 1-3: definitions and calculations. One definition plus one example per concept; for calculations, write formula, substitution, unit and a one-line meaning.\nWeeks 4-6: analysis. Every point as because-therefore, ending by naming the case actor or figure it applies to.\nWeeks 7-9: evaluation. Three paragraphs: one side, the other side, a conclusion with its condition.\nWeeks 10-12: whole papers to time, doing the evaluation first and filling the earlier parts afterwards – the order that actually scores.
Use it properly: this is not a checklist to finish. Every week must keep time for redoing errors, or from week 9 you will be repeating the same batch.
Pacing
| Paper | Time | Suggested split |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 2 (Case Study) | 1 h 30 min | about 22 min per question |
| Paper 1 (Short Answer / Data Response) | 1 h 30 min | about 15 min per question |
How should the time be split inside each IGCSE Business Studies 0450 Paper 2 paper?
Paper 2 (Case Study): about 22 min per question; Paper 1 (Short Answer / Data Response): about 15 min per question
The drilling mistakes that cost the most marks
| Mistake | What it looks like | What actually happens | Instead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/cost mixed | Profit = revenue + costs | Profit = revenue – costs | $120,000 |
| Margin denominator | Divide by cost | Divide by revenue | 66.7% |
| One-sided evaluation | For only | Both sides plus conclusion | both + conclusion |
The error log and the mark scheme
Three columns: the question with the case detail left out, the mark layers (application, analysis, evaluation) and whether the loss was time, structure or concept. Note the minutes remaining when time went wrong, and reorder the next paper accordingly.
How many years should you drill?
The 0450 case format has been consistent for years, but each session brings a new case, so drill the wording of the questions rather than memorising the case. Five recent sessions are enough; older papers are only good for calculation and definition practice.
How many years of past papers is enough?
The 0450 case format has been consistent for years, but each session brings a new case, so drill the wording of the questions rather than memorising the case. Five recent sessions are enough; older papers are only good for calculation and definition practice.
Frequently asked questions
Is this page a mock paper or a drilling guide?
This is the IGCSE Business Studies 0450 Paper 2 drilling guide: assessment structure, drill order, a 12-week timetable, pacing, common mark losses and the error-log method. For questions with answers, use the IGCSE Business Studies 0450 Paper 2 mock papers linked under Related.
By topic or by year first?
By topic. Eight to ten years of the same topic back to back is what exposes repeating errors; going straight to whole papers just repeats the same batch under time pressure.
How should the error log be written?
Do not copy out questions. Per error record four things: question reference, which step failed (concept, wording, calculation), what the mark scheme requires, and the correct action next time.
Must an evaluation end with a conclusion?
Yes, and the conclusion needs a condition: cutting price wins while demand is stable, the reverse when capacity is short. I think cutting is better earns nothing extra.
Can model answers be memorised?
Memorise the structure, never the content. The case changes every session, and a recycled example that does not fit costs application marks.
Official references
| Resource | What to use it for |
|---|---|
| Cambridge IGCSE Business Studies 0450 page | Confirm the paper marks and times |
| https://www.tutorzone.com.hk/en-igcse-business-studies-0450-paper-1-mock-2027/ | IGCSE Business Paper 1 drilling mock |
Related: practice area · IGCSE Business Paper 1 drilling mock
Next step: find a tutor / register as a tutor
After drilling, the hard part is telling a conceptual error from a writing error. Tell us the year group, the school and your available times, and TutorZone will match you with a tutor who knows the HKEAA assessment requirements.
Demand for tutors in this subject is steady, and those who can explain the marking scheme and where marks are won are especially sought after. Register free; you pay only when a match succeeds.


