A-Level Psychology 9990 Drilling Guide (AS and A Level): Papers 1-4, Pacing and a 12-Week Plan
- 2026-10-24
TUTORZONE EXAM DRILL GUIDE · A-LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY 9990: FOUR PAPERS, ONE ORDER
Built on Cambridge A-Level Psychology 9990 for the 2027 series: AS sits Paper 1 and Paper 2, 60 marks and 1 h 30 each at 50% of the AS; the A Level adds Paper 3 and Paper 4 so that all four papers carry 25%. This page is the drilling method only – what each paper really assesses, the drill order (by topic, by year, then the mark scheme), a 12-week timetable, pacing, the usual mark losses and the error log. For questions with answers use the original mock papers linked below.
How is A-Level Psychology 9990 assessed, and what does each part carry?
Paper 1 (Approaches, Issues and Debates): Section A 38 marks of core-study short answers, Section B 22 marks of (AS 50% / AL 25%); Paper 2 (Research Methods, the paper drilled here): Section A 46 marks on methods and scenarios, Section B a 14-mark plann (AS 50% / AL 25%); Paper 3 (Specialist Options): A Level content: two specialist options of 30 marks each (AL 25%); Paper 4 (Specialist Options: Application and Research Methods): Section A two options of 18 marks each, Section B a 24-mark planning q (AL 25%)

Assessment at a glance (2027)
| Component | Content | Weighting | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (Approaches, Issues and Debates) | Section A 38 marks of core-study short answers, Section B 22 marks of extended response and essay | AS 50% / AL 25% | 1 h 30 min |
| Paper 2 (Research Methods, the paper drilled here) | Section A 46 marks on methods and scenarios, Section B a 14-mark planning question | AS 50% / AL 25% | 1 h 30 min |
| Paper 3 (Specialist Options) | A Level content: two specialist options of 30 marks each | AL 25% | 1 h 30 min |
| Paper 4 (Specialist Options: Application and Research Methods) | Section A two options of 18 marks each, Section B a 24-mark planning question | AL 25% | 1 h 30 min |
A-Level Psychology drilling technique: separate the independent variable (what the researcher manipulates) from the dependent variable (what is measured); mean, median and mode suit different data – use the mode for nominal data and the median when there are extreme values; percentages remove the effect of sample size. In the planning question, write a testable hypothesis first, operationalise the IV and DV, and finish by evaluating generalisability or ethics – that section alone is 14 marks.
What each paper is actually testing
| Paper | Drill focus | How marks are lost |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (Approaches, Issues and Debates) | name the design before the findings | Short answers report the finding with no design, sample or sampling method; the comparison question places two core studies side by side without evaluating either |
| Paper 2 (Research Methods, the paper drilled here) | operationalise the IV and DV | No operationalisation: the IV is written as stress and the DV as memory, never as measurable values, so the hypothesis cannot be tested |
| Paper 3 (Specialist Options) | the essay splits into describe and evaluate | Option essays describe studies without linking them back to the behaviour the option explains, and one option is underprepared so it drains the other |
| Paper 4 (Specialist Options: Application and Research Methods) | apply methods to an unseen scenario | Scenario questions never name the method, and the 24-mark plan ignores ethics and generalisability, so it lands at half marks |
What is each A-Level Psychology 9990 paper really testing, and what should you drill?
Paper 1 (Approaches, Issues and Debates): name the design before the findings; Paper 2 (Research Methods, the paper drilled here): operationalise the IV and DV; Paper 3 (Specialist Options): the essay splits into describe and evaluate; Paper 4 (Specialist Options: Application and Research Methods): apply methods to an unseen scenario
Drill order: by topic, then by year, then the mark scheme
| Step | What you do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1. By topic | Work through each topic, starting with the paper that allows least help (no calculator / closed book) | Exposes what is genuinely not understood |
| 2. By year | Whole papers to time, one or two a week | Trains pace, stamina and question selection |
| 3. Mark scheme | Go through the marking scheme question by question and log the scoring steps you missed | Most lost marks are written wrong, not thought wrong |
Should drilling go by topic first or by year?
By topic first, then whole papers by year, then the mark scheme. The first third of the time goes topic by topic (8-10 years of the same topic back to back), the middle switches to timed whole papers, and the last fortnight only redoes the recurring errors from your log.
A 12-week drilling timetable
| Week | Phase | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-3 | By topic: foundation | Topic by topic, starting with the easiest marks, building habits and recall |
| Weeks 4-6 | By topic: core | 8-10 years of the same topic back to back, errors classified by topic |
| Weeks 7-8 | By topic: advanced and electives | Elective and higher-order topics, now under time pressure |
| Weeks 9-10 | By year: timed papers | One full paper a week, timed, no reference materials |
| Week 11 | Mark scheme work | Question by question against the marking scheme; list the scoring steps you omitted |
| Week 12 | Plug holes and simulate | Only the recurring errors from your log, then one full exam simulation |
Subject-specific weighting for this timetable: Twelve weeks sit in two halves: secure the AS first, then add the A Level. Weeks 1-4 are Paper 1 Section A only – sort the 12 core studies into the four approaches (biological, cognitive, learning, social), one approach a week, and answer inside five minutes using four lines: design, sample, findings, conclusion. Weeks 5-6 move to Paper 2, with Section A on method scenarios (operationalising IV and DV, sampling, reliability and validity) and two planning questions a week inside 25 minutes. Weeks 7-8 are Paper 1 Section B essays, two a week, each rewritten against the level descriptors. A Level candidates add Paper 3 in weeks 9-10, fixing the two options they know best and writing one description essay and one evaluation essay per option each week; week 11 is Paper 4 – the 18-mark scenario questions plus the 24-mark plan; week 12 rotates all four papers under time and redoes only the recurring error types.
Use it properly: this is not a checklist to finish. Every week must keep time for redoing errors, or from week 9 you will be repeating the same batch.
Pacing
| Paper | Time | Suggested split |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (Approaches, Issues and Debates) | 1 h 30 min | about 5 min per short answer, 35 min for the essay |
| Paper 2 (Research Methods, the paper drilled here) | 1 h 30 min | allow 25 min for the planning question |
| Paper 3 (Specialist Options) | 1 h 30 min | about 45 min per option |
| Paper 4 (Specialist Options: Application and Research Methods) | 1 h 30 min | allow 30 min for the planning question |
How should the time be split inside each A-Level Psychology 9990 paper?
Paper 1 (Approaches, Issues and Debates): about 5 min per short answer, 35 min for the essay; Paper 2 (Research Methods, the paper drilled here): allow 25 min for the planning question; Paper 3 (Specialist Options): about 45 min per option; Paper 4 (Specialist Options: Application and Research Methods): allow 30 min for the planning question
The drilling mistakes that cost the most marks
| Mistake | What it looks like | What actually happens | Instead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confusing IV and DV | Treating the measured outcome as the IV | The design and hypothesis collapse | The IV is the condition the researcher manipulates |
| Mean used blindly | Reporting the mean with extreme values | The result is skewed | Report the median when there are outliers |
| No operationalisation | Writing only ‘memory’ | It cannot be tested | Write words recalled correctly out of 20 |
| Comparing raw frequencies | 27 people against 18 people | Sample size is ignored | Convert to percentages first |
The error log and the mark scheme
Four columns, and never copy out questions: concept (which approach or option explanation was misused), operationalisation (were the IV and DV written as measurable values), evaluation (is there a named limitation and an alternative explanation), time (which question overran, and by how many minutes). Three entries in the third column in one week means the next week is evaluation sentences only, no new questions: the spread in 9990 sits in evaluation, and the spread in evaluation sits in naming one concrete limitation rather than counting how many studies you can recall.
How many years should you drill?
9990 runs a June and a November series each year (plus March in India), so official papers are plentiful. The current syllabus is the one for the 2027 series; the shape of Papers 1 and 2 has been stable for years, so eight to ten years can be drilled topic by topic. The specialist options in Papers 3 and 4 have been revised, so older papers are best raided for topics rather than sat whole. An AS candidate who has worked ten years of Papers 1 and 2 has enough: what separates candidates is rewriting the same Section B essay twice – sit it, mark it against the descriptors, then rewrite only the evaluation.
How many years of past papers is enough?
9990 runs a June and a November series each year (plus March in India), so official papers are plentiful. The current syllabus is the one for the 2027 series; the shape of Papers 1 and 2 has been stable for years, so eight to ten years can be drilled topic by topic. The specialist options in Papers 3 and 4 have been revised, so older papers are best raided for topics rather than sat whole. An AS candidate who has worked ten years of Papers 1 and 2 has enough: what separates candidates is rewriting the same Section B essay twice – sit it, mark it against the descriptors, then rewrite only the evaluation.
Frequently asked questions
Is this page a mock paper or a drilling guide?
This is the A-Level Psychology 9990 drilling guide: assessment structure, drill order, a 12-week timetable, pacing, common mark losses and the error-log method. For questions with answers, use the A-Level Psychology 9990 mock papers linked under Related.
By topic or by year first?
By topic. Eight to ten years of the same topic back to back is what exposes repeating errors; going straight to whole papers just repeats the same batch under time pressure.
How should the error log be written?
Do not copy out questions. Per error record four things: question reference, which step failed (concept, wording, calculation), what the mark scheme requires, and the correct action next time.
Does an AS candidate need to drill Papers 3 and 4?
No. The AS Level is Paper 1 and Paper 2 only, 50% of the AS each, and both must be taken in the same series. Papers 3 and 4 belong to the second-year A Level, where all four papers carry 25%. Start the design and evaluation notes on the 12 core studies during the AS year anyway, because the Paper 3 and Paper 4 essays are built on exactly those method concepts.
Both Paper 2 and Paper 4 have a planning question – how does the drilling differ?
The Paper 2 plan is worth 14 marks and stays inside AS research methods: turn the given scenario into a testable study. The Paper 4 plan is worth 24 marks, is designed in the context of the chosen specialist option, and must cover ethical handling and generalisability. Drill Paper 2 for speed and completeness, Paper 4 for depth of evaluation, and never reuse one answer for the other.
Official references
| Resource | What to use it for |
|---|---|
| Cambridge A-Level Psychology 9990 page | Confirm the format, marks and weightings |
| Official 2027 syllabus (PDF) | Check the marks and assessment objectives for Papers 1-4 |
| https://www.tutorzone.com.hk/en-alevel-economics-9708-paper-1-mock-2027/ | A-Level Economics Paper 1 drilling mock |
| https://www.tutorzone.com.hk/en-alevel-business-9609-mock-2027/ | A-Level Business 9609 drilling mock |
Related: A-Level Psychology 9990 original mock (research methods and the planning question, with answers) · practice area
Next step: find a tutor / register as a tutor
After drilling, the hard part is telling a conceptual error from a writing error. Tell us the year group, the school and your available times, and TutorZone will match you with a tutor who knows the HKEAA assessment requirements.
Demand for tutors in this subject is steady, and those who can explain the marking scheme and where marks are won are especially sought after. Register free; you pay only when a match succeeds.


