中文（繁體）
中文（简体）
English
IB Geography Paper 1: Option Choice, Case Studies and Data
Pick the right option first, then the data does the work
Paper 1 examines the optional units and expects named case studies with data, pushed forward by the command term. The skeleton is fixed: concept and location, then figures and trend, then the geographical process and one limitation. Missing either the name or the number leaves the answer at description level.
How is IB Geography Paper 1 assessed, and what does each part carry?
Paper 1 (Themes): SL two questions/40 marks; HL three/60 (SL 35%／HL 35%); Paper 2 (Core: Global Change): Section A short responses + B visual stimulus + C essay (SL 40%／HL 25%)
Assessment at a glance (2027)
| Component | Content | Weighting | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (Themes) | SL two questions/40 marks; HL three/60 | SL 35%／HL 35% | SL 1 h 30 min / HL 2 h 15 min |
| Paper 2 (Core: Global Change) | Section A short responses + B visual stimulus + C essay | SL 40%／HL 25% | 1 h 15 min |
IB Geography Paper 1 drilling technique: count the marks per part first (3 marks = three points, 4 marks = two points plus mechanism); structured parts use the figure only – do not recite the textbook; a 10-mark essay needs an intro, both sides and a judgement – Evaluate/To what extent demands a conclusion; about 45 minutes per question, never more than 50 on one.
What each paper is actually testing
| Paper | Drill focus | How marks are lost |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (Themes) | structured question + 10-mark essay | Definitions and models with no named case and no figure. |
| Paper 2 (Core: Global Change) | core themes (population, climate, resources) | The command term misread, describing where evaluation was asked. |
What is each IB Geography Paper 1 paper really testing, and what should you drill?
Paper 1 (Themes): structured question + 10-mark essay; Paper 2 (Core: Global Change): core themes (population, climate, resources)
Drill order: by topic, then by year, then the mark scheme
| Step | What you do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1. By topic | Work through each topic, starting with the paper that allows least help (no calculator / closed book) | Exposes what is genuinely not understood |
| 2. By year | Whole papers to time, one or two a week | Trains pace, stamina and question selection |
| 3. Mark scheme | Go through the marking scheme question by question and log the scoring steps you missed | Most lost marks are written wrong, not thought wrong |
Should drilling go by topic first or by year?
By topic first, then whole papers by year, then the mark scheme. The first third of the time goes topic by topic (8-10 years of the same topic back to back), the middle switches to timed whole papers, and the last fortnight only redoes the recurring errors from your log.
A 12-week drilling timetable
| Week | Phase | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-3 | By topic: foundation | Topic by topic, starting with the easiest marks, building habits and recall |
| Weeks 4-6 | By topic: core | 8-10 years of the same topic back to back, errors classified by topic |
| Weeks 7-8 | By topic: advanced and electives | Elective and higher-order topics, now under time pressure |
| Weeks 9-10 | By year: timed papers | One full paper a week, timed, no reference materials |
| Week 11 | Mark scheme work | Question by question against the marking scheme; list the scoring steps you omitted |
| Week 12 | Plug holes and simulate | Only the recurring errors from your log, then one full exam simulation |
Subject-specific weighting for this timetable: Weeks 1-3: a command-term table with one answer skeleton each for describe, explain and evaluate, the term circled before writing. Weeks 4-6: case cards in four lines, location and scale, key data, process, one limitation. Weeks 7-9: data reading, a trend sentence, two limitations, then the link back to process. Weeks 10-12: two timed questions a week, unseen cases last.
Use it properly: this is not a checklist to finish. Every week must keep time for redoing errors, or from week 9 you will be repeating the same batch.
Pacing
| Paper | Time | Suggested split |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (Themes) | SL 1 h 30 min / HL 2 h 15 min | about 45 min per question |
| Paper 2 (Core: Global Change) | 1 h 15 min | about 35 min for Section A |
How should the time be split inside each IB Geography Paper 1 paper?
Paper 1 (Themes): about 45 min per question; Paper 2 (Core: Global Change): about 35 min for Section A
The drilling mistakes that cost the most marks
| Mistake | What it looks like | What actually happens | Instead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reciting in structured parts | Textbook theory | Describe from the figure only | use the figure |
| Point count not matching marks | One point for a 3-mark part | One point per mark | match the marks |
| 10-mark essay with no conclusion | Strengths only | Both sides plus judgement | reach a conclusion |
| Over 50 minutes on one question | Overlong first answer | About 45 min per question | control the clock |
The error log and the mark scheme
Three columns: the question and the case used; the process that should have been named; whether the loss was command term, data, linkage or limitation. Command-term slips get the stem copied out and the skeleton rewritten.
How many years should you drill?
The optional units and question shapes are stable across years, so five years teaches the asking pattern, while case data goes stale and old papers serve as skeleton practice only, with the current guide checked for option content.
How many years of past papers is enough?
The optional units and question shapes are stable across years, so five years teaches the asking pattern, while case data goes stale and old papers serve as skeleton practice only, with the current guide checked for option content.
Frequently asked questions
Is this page a mock paper or a drilling guide?
This is the IB Geography Paper 1 drilling guide: assessment structure, drill order, a 12-week timetable, pacing, common mark losses and the error-log method. For questions with answers, use the IB Geography Paper 1 mock papers linked under Related.
By topic or by year first?
By topic. Eight to ten years of the same topic back to back is what exposes repeating errors; going straight to whole papers just repeats the same batch under time pressure.
How should the error log be written?
Do not copy out questions. Per error record four things: question reference, which step failed (concept, wording, calculation), what the mark scheme requires, and the correct action next time.
Which option should be chosen?
The one whose case you can describe most concretely. Spend a minute naming two cases and one figure for it, then commit; if that fails, switch.
Must a data question include a sketch?
Only when the question asks. For a trend, state direction, size and period in words, since a wrong sketch reads as a misunderstanding.
Official references
| Resource | What to use it for |
|---|---|
| IB Geography subject page (IBO) | Confirm the Paper 1-3 marks and times |
| https://www.tutorzone.com.hk/en-ib-history-paper-1-mock-2027/ | IB History Paper 1 drilling mock |
Related: practice area · IB Geography Paper 2 drilling mock · IB Geography Paper 3 drilling mock (HL) · IB History Paper 1 mock · IB Geography drilling guide
Next step: find a tutor / register as a tutor
After drilling, the hard part is telling a conceptual error from a writing error. Tell us the year group, the school and your available times, and TutorZone will match you with a tutor who knows the HKEAA assessment requirements.
Demand for tutors in this subject is steady, and those who can explain the marking scheme and where marks are won are especially sought after. Register free; you pay only when a match succeeds.