IB Maths AA SL: Drilling Both Papers and the Internal Assessment
- 2026-11-02
TUTORZONE EXAM DRILL GUIDE · IB MATHS AA SL: METHOD MARKS, THE CALCULATOR LINE, THE IA
AA SL is not marked on speed but on a complete method: formula, substitution, simplification, conclusion each carry their own step, and a skipped line loses marks even when the answer is right. The two papers differ over the calculator, one demands hand computation throughout while the other expects graphing as a check, and the internal assessment asks you to pose your own investigation. This page is the drilling method only – the 12-week split, the order to write each question, timing and the error log.
How is IB Mathematics AA SL assessed, and what does each part carry?
Paper 1 (no technology): Compulsory short- and extended-response questions; 80 marks (SL 40%); Paper 2 (this paper, GDC required): Short-response Section A + extended-response Section B; 80 marks (SL 40%); Exploration (internal assessment): 15 recommended hours within the 150-hour course (20%)

Assessment at a glance (2027)
| Component | Content | Weighting | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (no technology) | Compulsory short- and extended-response questions; 80 marks | SL 40% | 1.5 h |
| Paper 2 (this paper, GDC required) | Short-response Section A + extended-response Section B; 80 marks | SL 40% | 1.5 h |
| Exploration (internal assessment) | 15 recommended hours within the 150-hour course | 20% | during the course |
IB Maths AA SL Paper 2 drilling technique: decide first whether the question wants the GDC or algebra – roots, intersections, definite integrals, normal probabilities and inverse functions go to the GDC; proofs, simplification and exact values still need written steps. Give every numerical answer to three significant figures (one decimal place for angles) with units. Check Section A before moving on, because Section B builds on it.
What each paper is actually testing
| Paper | Drill focus | How marks are lost |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (no technology) | tests hand manipulation and proof | The no-calculator paper is written with calculator habits and steps are skipped, so the method marks go even when the final value is right. |
| Paper 2 (this paper, GDC required) | sketch or model first, then GDC and interpretation | Graph questions plot points but never state asymptotes, intercepts or the domain. |
| Exploration (internal assessment) | own topic, modelling and reflection | The IA investigation is too broad for its data, the model does not fit, and the conclusion becomes an opinion. |
What is each IB Mathematics AA SL paper really testing, and what should you drill?
Paper 1 (no technology): tests hand manipulation and proof; Paper 2 (this paper, GDC required): sketch or model first, then GDC and interpretation; Exploration (internal assessment): own topic, modelling and reflection
Drill order: by topic, then by year, then the mark scheme
| Step | What you do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1. By topic | Work through each topic, starting with the paper that allows least help (no calculator / closed book) | Exposes what is genuinely not understood |
| 2. By year | Whole papers to time, one or two a week | Trains pace, stamina and question selection |
| 3. Mark scheme | Go through the marking scheme question by question and log the scoring steps you missed | Most lost marks are written wrong, not thought wrong |
Should drilling go by topic first or by year?
By topic first, then whole papers by year, then the mark scheme. The first third of the time goes topic by topic (8-10 years of the same topic back to back), the middle switches to timed whole papers, and the last fortnight only redoes the recurring errors from your log.
A 12-week drilling timetable
| Week | Phase | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-3 | By topic: foundation | Topic by topic, starting with the easiest marks, building habits and recall |
| Weeks 4-6 | By topic: core | 8-10 years of the same topic back to back, errors classified by topic |
| Weeks 7-8 | By topic: advanced and electives | Elective and higher-order topics, now under time pressure |
| Weeks 9-10 | By year: timed papers | One full paper a week, timed, no reference materials |
| Week 11 | Mark scheme work | Question by question against the marking scheme; list the scoring steps you omitted |
| Week 12 | Plug holes and simulate | Only the recurring errors from your log, then one full exam simulation |
Subject-specific weighting for this timetable: Weeks 1-3: format the method. Four lines per question, formula, substitution, simplification, conclusion with units, and count the four lines before checking the answer.\nWeeks 4-6: the hand-computation paper. Drill surds, fractions, logarithms and exact trig values, one timed paper a week, and redo only three questions of each wrong type rather than copying the paper out again.\nWeeks 7-9: the calculator paper. Work by hand first, then check with the machine, and stop to find the reason whenever the two disagree; graph questions always state the window and how the intersection was read.\nWeeks 10-12: the IA and overall pace. Build one small investigation on a real data set and sit a full paper a fortnight, adding to the error log only the types that repeat.
Use it properly: this is not a checklist to finish. Every week must keep time for redoing errors, or from week 9 you will be repeating the same batch.
Pacing
| Paper | Time | Suggested split |
|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (no technology) | 1.5 h | analytic work: exact surds, fractions and algebra |
| Paper 2 (this paper, GDC required) | 1.5 h | about 40 min on Section A, 45 min on Section B, 5 min to check |
| Exploration (internal assessment) | during the course | work in stages, never in the last two weeks |
How should the time be split inside each IB Mathematics AA SL paper?
Paper 1 (no technology): analytic work: exact surds, fractions and algebra; Paper 2 (this paper, GDC required): about 40 min on Section A, 45 min on Section B, 5 min to check; Exploration (internal assessment): work in stages, never in the last two weeks
The drilling mistakes that cost the most marks
| Mistake | What it looks like | What actually happens | Instead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trigonometry without DEG mode | Evaluating cos 52° straight away | A radian-mode GDC gives a completely wrong side length | Set DEG or RAD first, then enter the angle |
| Calculator answer only | Copying the screen output | All method marks are lost, keeping only the answer mark | Write the formula, the substitution and the integral |
| Too many decimal places | Roots written to five or six decimals | IB wants three significant figures, so marks are deducted | Give every answer to three significant figures |
| Total distance as a displacement | Writing s(2) − s(0) | The return leg cancels out and removes half the distance | Add the absolute values of each stage |
The error log and the mark scheme
Three columns, one topic per page: the question and what it actually asks, whether prove, solve or explain; the move that lost the mark, whether a skipped step, a missing unit or domain, or a wrong calculator setting; and the fixed four lines for next time, written out for that question. Three entries in one column and ten questions of that type get redone in a single sitting.
How many years should you drill?
The assessment arrangements for AA have been stable, but the mix of question types shifts each session, so drill topics first: ten questions each on functions, trigonometry, calculus and statistics before sitting any paper end to end. Full papers are for timing and for deciding what to leave, never for predicting this session. Where an older question uses a tool no longer in the current course, skip it rather than arguing with it.
How many years of past papers is enough?
The assessment arrangements for AA have been stable, but the mix of question types shifts each session, so drill topics first: ten questions each on functions, trigonometry, calculus and statistics before sitting any paper end to end. Full papers are for timing and for deciding what to leave, never for predicting this session. Where an older question uses a tool no longer in the current course, skip it rather than arguing with it.
Frequently asked questions
Is this page a mock paper or a drilling guide?
This is the IB Mathematics AA SL drilling guide: assessment structure, drill order, a 12-week timetable, pacing, common mark losses and the error-log method. For questions with answers, use the IB Mathematics AA SL mock papers linked under Related.
By topic or by year first?
By topic. Eight to ten years of the same topic back to back is what exposes repeating errors; going straight to whole papers just repeats the same batch under time pressure.
How should the error log be written?
Do not copy out questions. Per error record four things: question reference, which step failed (concept, wording, calculation), what the mark scheme requires, and the correct action next time.
Should SL students drill HL questions?
Not as papers. After finishing a topic, read two or three HL extension questions for their phrasing and to test where the concept ends; the marks themselves come from complete method lines on SL papers.
Can the IA be left to the last three months?
Better not. An investigation needs time to collect data and refit the model; leaving only the writing means no room to recover when the data refuse the first hypothesis. Have the first round of data collected before week ten.
Official references
| Resource | What to use it for |
|---|---|
| IB mathematics curriculum page (IBO) | Confirm the Paper 1-2 marks and weighting |
| IB Maths AA SL Paper 1 mock | no-technology hand algebra |
| IB Maths AI SL Paper 2 mock | the same-level GDC paper |
| Practice area | index of IB subject mocks |
Original mock: IB Mathematics AA SL mock paper with answers; more practice in the practice area.
Next step: find a tutor / register as a tutor
After drilling, the hard part is telling a conceptual error from a writing error. Tell us the year group, the school and your available times, and TutorZone will match you with a tutor who knows the HKEAA assessment requirements.
Demand for tutors in this subject is steady, and those who can explain the marking scheme and where marks are won are especially sought after. Register free; you pay only when a match succeeds.


